Ucb Supplemental Questionaire

not daunted and want to go to the end

COMPLAINT BY ATTORNEY CORRUPTION CASE FILE FINV

Deza, does not remain with folded arms

SAN VICENTE .- Attorney Robert Henry Deza Quispe Decentralized Anti Cañete Judicial District, filed a COMPLAINT LAW and / or injunction against the file or not to formalize and continue the preliminary investigation against the former mayors and commune officials cañetana by the improper use of resources and recruitment FINV attorney Abanto Jackeline Cacho. Deza

Quispe stated in its brief filed on April 28 this year before the Public Ministry, the Prosecutor has requested the provincial Attorney Criminal preliminary investigations extend long enough to perform some essential research tools as :

- Letter to the Continental Bank to forward certified copies of paid checks FINV account from January 1, 2007 to December 31, 2010, asking the same time the provincial city of Cañete do the same, because the mayor Maria Montoya own local media said the bank and they had delivered such checks.

- Check through the videos that have the bank, paying some random checks to determine the people who collected them, especially those of large sums or where the people who are not registered revolved in the database of RENIEC.

also requests that required the municipal offices of treasury and accounting to report if they have payment requirements or documents that support the FINV account spending and all this documentation is sent to the Division of Research of Crimes against Public Administration DIVINDCAP the Anti-Corruption Directorate of the Ministry of Interior DIRCOCOR.

In summary, the Anticorruption Attorney Cañete Judicial District, said that the rationale expressed by the Attorney Elizabeth Leaño Vadillo, and therefore has not formalized and the continuation of the preliminary investigation on the three major crimes: COLLUSION , embezzlement and misappropriation of funds, only the arguments mentioned in the complaint for by the former mayor and council, not to mention a single product documentation of their research, thus demonstrating the prosecutor, who has not done any research activities.

This would demonstrate that the representative of the Attorney General, implicitly waived its functions and powers conferred by the Constitution and its Charter as: a.

-Defender legality

b. - Safeguarding the public interest

c. - Exercise prosecuting d. - Ensure proper administration of justice. (Elarquim)